Historical Impact on Working Conditions (HR, Employee Labor and Research Paper - 1

Historical Impact on Working Conditions (HR, Employee Labor and Relations) - explore Paper ExampleThe momentum of cotton culture took off with deployment of large number of Black slaves. In 1790, it is estimated that 700,000 slave workers lived around Ohio River and Mason-Dixon Line (Reef, 2007, pp. XVI-XIX).Throughout eighteenth century, factories grew rapidly where profit was the chief motive. Without any legislation to protect workers rights, the situation was quite messy for laborers who often had to work 14 hours a day. Laborers often protested, only if could not match the power of employers. In 1835, a strike was organized in Philadelphia for 10 hours in a day work. By the end of civilian war, factories were more organized in technical enclosures with better equipments and tools. Coming up of railroads carried the next level of growth momentum. Yet, labors had little say on their workings. by and by the civil war, the struggle gained momentum from labors, though in unorgan ized and uncoordinated fashion. With little or no government assistance, it was tough to move forward (Reef, 2007, p. XIX).Although the term collective bargaining was initially used in 1891 by economist Sidney Webb, it was introduced in raw form ever since the inception of trade unions soon by and by the post civil war period. Collective bargaining is a method of arbitration between firm and the agents of a unit of employees intended at arriving at deals that sets operational conditions. Collective agreements normally specify wage amounts, shift hours, training, security, extra hours pay, and rights to take part in factory or corporation issues. Working conditions soft improved side-by-side with the growth of trade unions. Many labor legislations were passed that set standard rules for hiring and remunerating labors. The first key event in the US labor history was plaque of the American Federation of Labor (AFL) in 1886. AFL ran on the form of craft unions and was conservative in the sense that it did not challenge capitalism per se. Instead, it was