Mind soul Essay

1. How be Platos and Descartes views of the soul/self-importance-importance similar? Both Plato and Descartes believe that the soul/self is best (or only) to think and tick off separate from the torso and its faculties. According to Plato, the soul reasons best without bodily senses. Plato claims that sight, hearing, pain, and joy are a distraction to the soul in its search for reality, and that h unmatchablest knowledge can only be achieved with pure thought alone. The ashes confuses the soul and prevents it from acquiring truth and wisdom whenever it is associated with it. Descartes very similarly believes that the body and its faculties, namely imagination and again the senses, are distinguished from the self as modes from a thing. According to Descartes, the essence of the self consists entirely on being a thinking thing. The body can perceive pain and pleasure, just now nothing beyond that, it is up to the intellect to conduct its own inquiry into things external to us. Thus, much like Plato, Descartes claims that it is this thinking essence, and not the body, and though alone, and not perception, that is the key to true knowledge.2. How are Humes and Nietzsches views of the self similar, and how are they different? Both Hume and Nietzsche believe that the self is a summation of ones actions and perceptions. According to Hume, the self is a collection of perceptions in constant flux and movement. There is no simplicity or identity in the self, but only an infinite system of perceptions in an infinite florilegium of postures and situations. These perceptions are then linked by the coincidences of cause and effect, which reciprocally influence, modify, alter, give, and destroy each other(a)(a).Nietzsche similarly believes that the self is merely a relation of serviceman desires to each other. According to Nietzsche, desires and pleasures or human drives are the commander. This human drive controls everything else, and the strongest dr ive is a tyrant, even reason and conscience assent down. Both philosophers ultimately agree that in that location is no pure forms or simplicity of the self, but that it is rather driven by actions and perceptions, as nearly as desires and pleasures.Humes main idea of the self is that there is no self that is stable over time, rather the self is merely a series of transient feelings, sensations, and impressions of oneself at any given moment. That is, there is no unified self that ties all perceptions together. Nietzsches main idea of the self is different as it reaches a little into the very motivation for the self and life. Nietzsche argues that the self is composed of drives, but unlike Hume, goes further to say that these drives closely vie with each other to be the ultimate purpose of existence and the master of all other drives. Nietzsche calls this the pass on to power and illustrates the point accordingly ever documentation body within which individuals treat each o ther as equals does to another body what the individuals within refrain from doing to each other. The will to power is to grow, spread, seize, and become predominant it not only drives the self but in any case the reality of the creative activity. 3. How is Platos view of the worlds creative activity similar to the ordinary apparitional view, and how is it different?Similar to the ordinary ghostlike view of the creative activity of the world, Plato believes that the universe was created by a maker or a god, who not only made the world to be as excellent and supreme as nature would allow it, but who also endowed it with soul and intelligence. Platos views also coincide with the ordinary religious view when he claims that the universe is physical and changing, that god is good and fair, and that there is order rather than disorder.Plato however differs from the ordinary religious view of the creation of the world when he claims that there is a second type of universe other than the physical unending universe, that never changes. According to Plato, god uses this eternal model of the universe and the forms (of beauty, good, etc. ) as a template to create the existing world. The universe resembles an ideal alert thing of which all other ideal living things are a part of the ideal living thing comprehends in itself all other intelligible ideal living things.