Intel Company Analysis

Today, Intel is commitd in many private information processing systems and lab- big tops. The fede dimensionn has make a brand for itself and has been commensurate to sustain ranks among many famed competitors. Today, Intel holds great than 80 percent of the microprocessors commercialise beca drug abuse of the victory of its Pentium splintering (Semiconductor 1). This floor contains information pertaining to the Intel Company from the beginning and up to 2001. As many electronic computer chip companies Intel had battles being at the top of the competitors lists, as well as producing products worth individual attention.This report aloneow make a background of the community, an diligence outline that will explain Intels top competitors in detail, a SWOT analysis, a financial analysis and will conclude with suggestions that can help the keep company dumbfound pull ahead. The Intel sight began in 1968. Two men atomic number 18 put forwardd the founders of this co mpany Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore. Originally, Noyce and Moore wanted to name the company Moore Noyce after their names but hit the sack it sounded like more noise and was not a suitable name for a computer chip company. The company was then named Intel for integrated engineering. The archean focus of the company was on integrated circuit memory devices. peerless of the first of all tasks encountered by Intel was producing a DRAM (dynamic random access memory) with a swallow edges. In 1970, the 1103 was produced. The 1103 was the balls first 1-kilobyte DRAM. This undercut prices and had change magnitude performance while being smaller. By 1972 the 1103 was the top hatselling semiconductor memory chip in the world and the first commercial computer available was the HP 9800 series. Intel was able to pull in commercialize divide at this time and this allowed them to refer researching and developing new products.However, by 1978 Intel was a full gene balancen arsehole the Japanese when it came to the 16K DRAM and by 1984 Intels total trade in DRAMs was barely 1%. The EPROM was produced and it allowed easy programming and gave users the capability to deplete memory with ultraviolet light. It was not until Intel decided to raise the prices of the EPROM technology that it made m wizardy and in 1984 the EPROM was Intels money maker. The microprocessor was formulateed in 1971 and at that time Intel did not hear the potential to use it for personal computers.The 4004 microprocessor was primarily apply in calculators but in 1974 the 8080 microprocessor became the standard and Intel became the perseverance leader in 8- bit market (Intel 1). Then in 1980, Intels 8088 microprocessor was teamed with IBMs first Personal Computer. This gave Intel a pear-shaped competitive advantage. grove stated The presence of IBM in the early 80s was crucial. By winning that contract, we win the whole perseverance design. This led to the development of the 80386, th e first 32-bit processor in 1985. The 386 was an instant success and at that time Intel similarly decided to sole-produce and draw a blank sourcing to AMD.This led to an eight year legal battle that was eventually negotiated in 1995. To continue gaining competitive advantage Intel moved into other markets. In 1998 Intel begins sorrowful into digital photo graphy, video, networking equipment and Internet commerce markets by manufacturing special chips (Intel 1). However, by 2001 Intel denote it was going remain foc utilise on microchips. At that time Intel had a clear competitive advantage oer the microchip market. The SIC rule for Intel is 3674 for semiconductors and related devices. The NAICS code is 334413 for semiconductor and related device manufacturing.The semiconductor effort is very cyclical. For instance, in the year 1995 sales grew 40% and were up to $ one hundred fifty billion but in 2001sales fell sharply to $139 billion (Semiconductor 1). In order for Intel to gai n and maintain market apportion they needed to let unique success factors. on that point are many key success factors for Intel. Intel started with innovators. Noyce and Moore were able to make for chances and risks that caused a very successful company. These two were also good managers. They made few mistakes and really took advantage of all their employees.They put their employees as a top priority and stressed openness, innovativeness and responsibility (Carmichael 1). Intel Corporations top competitors are Texas Instruments, AMD, and Motorola. Texas Instrument started in 1930 by Dr. Clarence Karcher and Eugene McDermott. It started as a geophysical service that had a unique way of using seismology to explore oil. In order to keep their equipment out of sight from competitors they hired J. Erik Johnson. The company made headway by teaming with the military and in 1961 TI invents the first computer with a silicon integrated base for the Airforce.Then, in 1967 TI invented the first hand-held calculator. Texas instruments hand over a variety of products from clocks to digital channelize processors. Texas Instruments main competitive advantage over Intel is calculators. patch Intels focus was personal computers, Texas Instruments was dominating calculators and the education campaign. AMD Corporation is a company similar to Intel. During the early years AMD and Intel worked together to produce graphic symbol products. AMD began in 1969 by founder Jerry Sanders. In 1982, IBM had AMD sign as a imprimatur source to Intel for their manufacturing (AMD 1).It was clear that these companies were competing to have the competitive advantage over each other. Another semiconductor company in the perseverance is Motorola. Motorola began in the 1920s by Paul Galvin. In 1993 Motorola was ranked third of the worlds semiconductor manufacturers (Semiconductor 1). During the early years Motorola had a communication focus. There first product was a battery eliminator th at allowed clients to use radios without batteries. They began developing pagers and cell phones and their six sigma quality allowed for good competitive advantage.The five-spot forces model helps to draw conclusions about the entire manufacture. For affrights of new entrance the consideration is low. In the semiconductor business many companies have patented products. The products produced in this industry are based on innovation. These patents will make it dangerous for a new entrant to join the industry. Another reason the holy terror of a new entrant is low in this industry is the summation specificity. This industry requires highly specialized technology and most potential entrants will be reluctant to acquire these specialized assets. For these reasons the threat of new entrants in this industry is low.For bargaining power of suppliers the anatomy is high. The condition is high because on that point is a significant cost to switch suppliers. An example of this is Inte ls birth with PC manufacturers. Intel cannot switch manufacturers without expecting a high cost. The bargaining power of nodes is associated with the equal that customers have on a producing industry. In the industry of Intel the power of customers is medium to low. In this industry the makers supply a critical portion of emptors input. Intel is the producer in this instance.They are supplying a crucial fraction to the buyer and the buyer needs to be willing to pay the price for the piece of equipment. However, to have a competitive advantage in this industry in that respect needs to be some bargaining power to the customers. Maintaining a reasonable price compared to other competitors is very important so the buyers keep orgasm back. In any industry at that place is going to be a threat of substitutes. In the industry of Intel the threat of substitutes is medium. Competitors in this industry are always going to try and invent the best processor that all individuals will e ventually need.However, because of the number of patents and copyrights in this industry substituting other house inventions be go on difficult. The delay condition facing industries according to the five forces model is contestation. In this industry the rivalry condition is high. There are many reasons it can be tell that the rivalry is high in this industry. For one, the fade barriers are high. Even if the firm is unprofitable at a certain time the cost to exit the industry forces the firm to compete and stay in the industry. Second, high unflinching costs in this industry intensify rivalry.The fight for market share in this industry is high because firms must fight to sell the large quantities in fruit. Another reason of high rivalry in this industry is the number of firms. With the large number of firms competing the rivalry increases because each firm wants to gain market share. Intel as a company can be looked at more in depth by a SWOT analysis. This analysis focuses on strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to the company. Intel has many strengths. One strength is their strong market agency and brand name.The company started out with nothing and has become one of the best microprocessor companies. Advanced technology capabilities are also strength to the Intel Company. Without these advance technologies Intel would not be a successful company. The innovative technologies are at the plaza of the company. Another strength of Intel is their strategic alliances and partnerships. The company has partnerships with major players including Asustek Computer, Comstar, Cisco, Fujitsu, IBM, Microsoft, Micron Technology, solarise Microsystems, Sprint,Verizon, and Yahoo (Datamonitor). These partnership have enabled Intel to produce very significant projects. Also, partnering limits opposition in the market. Without worrying about what the other company is going to come out with adjacent, partnering allows for both companies to work together to come up with a great product Some weaknesses of the Intel company include their lack of customer concentration. Intel is a micro processing manufacturing company so the number of customers consuming the products is low. Intel has high dependence on these customers which reduces bargaining power. non being able to reduce prices quickly can also yearn Intel.With Intel, reducing prices for customers quickly could hurt other areas of production which could lead to dissatisfaction in other areas. The response to customers is seen as weakness because in order to have a competitor advantage appealing to the customer is crucial. There are many opportunities for Intel as a company. Proposing acquisitions could broaden Intels portfolio and help them gain competitive advantage in the market. Intel could also grow in the global and PC market. Intel offers products including microprocessors and related chipsets designed for the notebook and netbook market segments.Moreover, the companys Atom processor for these segments is very prominent with growing demand. Growing PC market will contribute to steady revenue flows for the company in near term (Datamonitor 11). The last part of the SWOT analysis is the threats a company has. Increasing competition is a threat to Intel. When Intels competitors espouse in producing something a customer wants before them, Intel could run the risk of losing market share or position. No company wants to lose market share to another competitor. In Intels industry there is always a threat that another company will produce something at great speed.Another threat to Intel is litigations and the regulatory commission. In the past Intel was investigated for alleged below the belt business transactions, and alleged security failure. Future occurrences of these event will maltreat Intels reputation and investor reputation. The financial ratios and graphs can be found on the attached pages. The first analysis to look at is profitability. The net rim was used in calculating these numbers. By the graph you can see that Intels margin was the most profitable in the time periods 1999-2001.When a company has a high profit margin it means that they are selling their products at higher premiums. The graph shows that Intel sold its products at the highest premium. The next analysis estimates liquidity. Liquidity is the ability for a company to be able to meet there near term obligations. The current ratio was used in calculating these numbers. A firm wants a current ratio greater than one. If a firm has a current ratio greater than one it means that they are able to satisfy their near term liabilities. If a firm has a current ratio less than one it means the firm could have a liquidity issue.The graph shows all the companies were able to maintain a liquidity higher than one except Motorola in 2000. The next financial analysis was looking at leverage. The debt-to-equity ratio was used to determine how leveraged Intel and the compe titor companies were. The debt-to-equity compares the companies liabilities to their equity. Companies want to have a write down percentage because that means they are using begin leverage and have a stronger equity position. From the graph it is apparent that Intel has the best leverage because of the lower percentage rates.The results shows that Motorola has a very low equity position because there liabilities outweigh there equities. The other two companies, AMD and Texas Instruments seem to be change magnitude there liability numbers over time and in the coming years may have a better equity position. The last financial analysis estimate efficiency. The inventory overturn ratio was used to estimate these numbers. The inventory ratio tells you how often a company moves or sells inventory. To predict if a company has a good inventory turnover it is helpful to look at competitors results.In the graph included in the attachments, it can be observed that in 1999 and 2000 Intel ha d the second highest inventory turnover. This means that it took longer for Intel to sell inventories than Texas Instruments or Motorola at that time. However, in the year 2001 it had the lowest inventory turnover. In order to obtain a long lasting company these passs could help the company. Some immediate recommendations that should take place in 90 days or less could be to obtain ideas from employees to improve the company or how to gain competitive advantage. audience to individuals that work for the company may help gain new ideas.Intel prides itself on the innovativeness their employees and it is important to give them a say in how they think the company is doing or where they think it can improve. Another immediate recommendation is a new marketing campaign to seek computer users to switch to Intel processors as opposed to competitors. I think it is important for consumers to understand the residue between core processors (such as Intel and AMD) not just the difference in t he actual computer (like Dell and Apple). The average American does not know the difference and educating these individuals will help Intel gain a competitor advantage. concisely term recommendations could include a price-reducing analysis. If the company could find ways to lower the prices of manufacturing they can gain competitive advantage. Also a short-term recommendation could be to research more about the cellular and wireless industry to see if it would be worth it to the company to branch out boost form micro processors. Long term recommendations expand industry further not just for computer but gain market share in cellular and wireless devices. Intel has been the leader of microprocessors for many years. If they can use their knowledge Intel could expand .