English Writting Critical Response

THE CLOSING OF THE AMERICAN MIND2006Summary of Nielsen s opinion of higher education and the beaten(prenominal) school ashesNeilsen criticizes present-day higher education for being additive . He implies that disciples no get alonglong see the whole jut exactly kind of , they be confine to their own palm tree of choice (Nielsen 17 . This writer agrees to the consequence that colleges and universities be pleasant to a greater extent and more(prenominal) specialized , chase the trends in contemporary work . How incessantly , it seems that Nielsen ( heyday ) is in like manner hasty in generalizing that because of this , students no bimestrial see the whole picture . He assumes too frequently without presenting any evidence other than , perhaps , in-person be . Nielsen and kick would also presume that it is on ly done the test of liberal arts and classic books that students raise discover the impartiality . This statement is certainly too regretful and it offers no pass along explanation of how and why they present this positionNielsen and Bloom atomic number 18 excessively critical of modern-day education without victorious into account the technological and attitudinal changes of that are happening everywhere in the world . They take asunder to recognize that communication channels are almost unlimited and passel learn from one other even if they are hundreds of miles apart . They fail to mention that multitude today have more access to more literature and ideas that ever before . plenty are no longer limited to physiologic libraries but they can extract terabytes of ideas and opinions through their home computer The bring out worldwide exchange of ideas is providing more learning than any physical educational institution could ever hope to provide . We are now in a n age of self-education and traditional limi! ted modes of education are belatedly losing their place in some(prenominal)(prenominal) the academic world and outsideNielsen also criticizes the public school system for their poor level of learning and writing instruction , forcing colleges and universities to gestate remedial English classes (Nielsen 9 .

This might be accepted to a certain extent but once once again , neither Neilsen nor Bloom offers a reliable source of randomness . They presume that just because people watch more video recording than in the past , they are less intelligent . It is honest , however , that educators must recommit themselves to exc el in educational activity the basics (the three R s ) correctlyWhy would Nielsen argue that students should take both arts and sciencesQuoting Bloom , the phrase says that a cracking curriculum for liberal education feeds the student s love of truth and animosity to live a good life (Nielsen 17 . Nielsen and Bloom believe that it is not adequacy to train people to contract excellent in their elect fields . They also study have a all-around(prenominal) education that offers pathways to the good life of light and virtue (Nielsen 2 . They also criticize universities for cultivating the idea of clean-living relativism in the minds of the students (Nielsen 4 . They say that student direct their lives consort to principles which they find commodious and that they no longer seek for secure truths . Student would instead seek for truths...If you want to get a full essay, smart set it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write ! my paper